Without Book Interview Questions and Answers | Online Test | Moct Test
Download Android App in your Android Device from Google Play Store
- Search for "Withoutbook Practice Exam Test" in Mobile/Tablet Play Store
Institute Training Search by Name or Email

Exams Attended

Make Homepage

Bookmark this page

Subscribe Email Address

Difference between jQuery Mobile and Bootstrap

Choose Subjects for getting difference ⇒ Refresh this page
vs
jQuery MobileBootstrap
jQuery Mobile is developed by JQuery project group.Twitter bootstrap is developed by Mark Otto and Jacob Thornton from Twitter.
Purpose: The user interface of the jQuery mobile is a JavaScript library and it comprises (i) animations, (ii) widgets and (iii) a theme roller, which enables easy customization of the jQuery elements.Purpose: Twitter Bootstrap enables developing applications with the help of (i) HTML, (ii) CSS and (iii) JavaScript. Twitter bootstrap can be considered as a huge mass of CSS that enables raising projects faster and easier.
User interface performance: JQuery Mobile normally offers a greater performance than Twitter bootstrap. Especially JQuery performs well while utilizing sliders and drop down options in the project.User interface performance: Twitter Bootstrap offers average performance while comparing JQuery Mobile.
With Twitter bootstrap, if the sliders are used in a project, then it becomes difficult to drag them on mobiles.
The drop down menus developed with twitter bootstrap also offer poor performance on Android devices and iOS. The options present in the end of the menu become inaccessible, as the conventional menu UI (Twitter bootstrap) does not support scrolling.
Reactive design: JQuery Mobile does not offer an in-built supple grid arrangement. When the applications developed by JQuery are uploaded on the computer, they look similar to mobile apps.Reactive design: Twitter Bootstrap offers a better receptive design compared to JQuery Mobile. The supple grid system of Twitter Bootstrap is much easier to understand and they offer a great better performance. The apps developed with Twitter bootstrap work well both on mobiles and computers.
Customization: JQuery mobile is difficult when it comes to customization. JQuery Mobile requires a lot of effort to develop fresh themes. Also the already available themes on JQuery mobile are unexciting.Customization: Twitter Bootstrap is very simple to customize. Also Twitter bootstrap supports many 3rd party themes such as ‘Flat UI’.
Functionality: JQuery UI is mainly to provide pre-written devices using general functions. Also it is possible to theme and to incorporate the user interface of JQuery inside Twitter bootstrap.Functionality: Twitter bootstrap targets mainly on (i) design and appearance, and (ii) rational defaults. Twitter Bootstrap primarily offers a foundation for the users to develop a model rapidly at the front end.
Is it helpful? Yes No
Get differences from below
JSF vs JSPJSP vs ServletsJSP vs ASP
JSF 1.2 vs JSF 2.0JSF 2.0 vs JSF 2.1Java 5 vs Java 6
Java 6 vs Java 6 update 10Java 6 vs Java 7Java 6 update 10 vs Java 6 update 12
Java 1.0 vs Java 1.1Java 1.1 vs Java 1.2Java 1.2 vs Java 1.3
Java 1.3 vs Java 1.4Java 1.4 vs Java 5Struts 1 vs Struts 2
Struts 1.1 vs Struts 1.2Struts 1.2 vs Struts 1.3Linux vs Unix
C vs C++Java vs C++Java vs J2EE
Struts vs JSFStruts vs SpringApache vs IIS
Jboss vs TomcatJboss vs WebLogicJavaScript vs Jquery
JavaScript vs VBScriptJquery vs AngularJSHTML vs XML
HTML vs XHTMLHTML vs DHTMLHTML 5 vs HTML 4
Java 7 vs Java 8EJB 2.0 vs EJB 3.0EJB 3.0 vs Spring
JDBC vs HibernateJDBC vs JPAJDBC 3.0 vs JDBC 4.0
CSS 2 vs CSS 3EJB 1.0 vs EJB 2.0AWT vs Swing
Swing vs AppletPHP vs JSPJ2EE vs J2ME
Java 8 vs Java 9MVC 1 vs MVC 2Hibernate 3 vs Hibernate 4
Spring 3.0 vs Spring 4.0jQuery Mobile vs BootstrapJavaBeans vs EJB
JSON vs XMLRESTful Web Services vs SOAP Web ServicesSpring 2.5 vs Spring 3.0
HTTP vs HTTPSAngularJS vs NodeJS
©2016 WithoutBook