Centro de comparacion de temas

AWT frente a Swing

Revisa las diferencias entre AWT y Swing en una tabla estructurada y despues continua con preguntas de entrevista, cuestionarios y comparaciones similares.

9 puntos de comparacion

1 comparaciones relacionadas

Diferencia entre

AWT vs Swing - una comparacion clave de temas o materias que te ayudara a entender cual es mejor para tu caso. Consulta la comparacion de Swing y AWT como preguntas comunes de entrevista.

Resumen de la comparacion

Diferencia entre AWT y Swing

AWT vs Swing - una comparacion clave de temas o materias que te ayudara a entender cual es mejor para tu caso. Consulta la comparacion de Swing y AWT como preguntas comunes de entrevista.

AWT Primer tema de esta comparacion lado a lado.

9 filas de comparacion disponibles actualmente en esta pagina.

Swing Segundo tema de esta comparacion lado a lado.

AWT	Swing Interview Online Test
AWT components are called Heavyweight component.	Swings are called light weight component because swing components sits on the top of AWT components and do the work.
AWT components are platform dependent.	Swing components are made in purely java and they are platform independent.
AWT components require java.awt package.	Swing components require javax.swing package.
AWT is a thin layer of code on top of the OS.	Swing is much larger. Swing also has very much richer functionality.
AWT stands for Abstract windows toolkit.	Swing is also called as JFC (Java Foundation classes). It is part of Oracle's Java Foundation Classes (JFC).
These feature is not available in AWT.	Swing has many advanced features like JTabel, Jtabbed pane which is not available in AWT. Also. Swing components are called "lightweight" because they do not require a native OS object to implement their functionality. JDialog and JFrame are heavyweight, because they do have a peer. So components like JButton, JTextArea, etc., are lightweight because they do not have an OS peer.
This feature is not supported in AWT.	We can have different look and feel in Swing.
Using AWT, you have to implement a lot of things yourself.	Swing has them built in.
With AWT, you have 21 "peers" (one for each control and one for the dialog itself). A "peer" is a widget provided by the operating system, such as a button object or an entry field object.	With Swing, you would have only one peer, the operating system's window object. All of the buttons, entry fields, etc. are drawn by the Swing package on the drawing surface provided by the window object. This is the reason that Swing has more code. It has to draw the button or other control and implement its behavior instead of relying on the host operating system to perform those functions.

Guardar para repaso

Guarda este elemento en marcadores, marcalo como dificil o agregalo a un conjunto de repaso.

Abrir mi biblioteca de aprendizaje

Es util? Si No

Mas como esto

Diferencias relacionadas

Explora comparaciones similares relacionadas con AWT y Swing para obtener mas contexto y preparar mejor tus entrevistas.

Swing frente a Applet Abrir la pagina completa de comparacion lado a lado.

Explorar comparaciones

Ver diferencias abajo

Explora todas las comparaciones disponibles abajo o usa la busqueda superior para reducir la lista al instante.

Desarrolla tus habilidades con rutas de aprendizaje enfocadas, examenes de practica y contenido listo para entrevistas.