EJB 2.0 vs EJB 3.0
Tinjau perbedaan antara EJB 2.0 dan EJB 3.0 dalam tabel perbandingan terstruktur, lalu lanjutkan ke pertanyaan wawancara, kuis, dan perbandingan serupa.
Perbedaan Antara
EJB 2.0 vs EJB 3.0 - A key comparison and difference of the topics or subjects that will help you understand which is best for your use case. Check out to compare EJB 3.0 and EJB 2.0 as very common job interview questions.
Perbedaan antara EJB 2.0 dan EJB 3.0
EJB 2.0 vs EJB 3.0 - A key comparison and difference of the topics or subjects that will help you understand which is best for your use case. Check out to compare EJB 3.0 and EJB 2.0 as very common job interview questions.
|
EJB 2.0
|
EJB 3.0
|
|---|---|
| EJB 2.0 uses the entity Beans for accessing the databases. | EJB 3.0 uses the JPA to access the database. |
| EJB 2.0 needs deployment description. | There is no requirement of deployment description while using EJB 3.0. |
| In EJB 2.0, we have to write Home and Remote interface to have access the databases. | EJB 3.0 does not have such constraint and is more convenient in this regard. |
| Security issues are handling through Deployment descriptors in EJB 2.0. | EJB 3.0 is using annotation. |
| EJB 2.0 has limitation in its pluggability with third party persistence providers. | These limitations not exist in EJB 3.0. |
| In EJB 3.0, Query is very flexible and several levels of joins are enabled through the refined EJB-QL. | While EJB 3.0 is facilitating with refined EJB-QL and hence database queries written are very flexible. |
Simpan untuk Revisi
Bookmark item ini, tandai sebagai sulit, atau masukkan ke dalam set revisi.
Masuk untuk menyimpan bookmark, pertanyaan sulit, dan set revisi.
Perbedaan terkait
Jelajahi perbandingan serupa yang terkait dengan EJB 2.0 dan EJB 3.0 untuk konteks yang lebih luas dan persiapan wawancara.
Lihat perbedaan di bawah
Jelajahi semua perbandingan topik yang tersedia di bawah ini, atau gunakan kotak pencarian di atas untuk mempersempit daftar secara instan.